From The USA’s $954 Billion Defense Budget To Germany’s Unexpected Rise To Fourth Globally, From Ukraine’s Record-High Share Of Government Spending To India’s $92 Billion Surge Driven By The May 2025 India-Pakistan Conflict. The 2025 SIPRI Rankings Rewrite The Map Of Global Military Power
According to Visual Capitalist and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, world military expenditure reached $2.88 trillion in 2025, an increase of 2.9 percent from the year before the 11th consecutive annual rise; bringing the global military burden to 2.5 percent of GDP, its highest level since 2009. To put that number into perspective, $2.88 trillion amounts to $350 of military spending for each person on the planet.
The five biggest military spenders were the United States at $954 billion, China at $336 billion, Russia at $190 billion, Germany at $114 billion, and India at $92 billion; accounting for more than half, or 58 percent, of world military spending. The United States alone accounted for roughly one-third of all global military expenditure. No other nation accounted for even 12 percent of global military spending, highlighting the scale of America’s lead.
The United States: $954 billion and declining but not for long. The most striking headline in the 2025 data is that US military spending declined in absolute terms from its 2024 level, largely because the US approved no new military assistance to Ukraine in 2025 and SIPRI counts foreign military assistance as expenditure of the donor country.
Strip out that accounting effect and the picture is different: when the US is excluded from the statistics, global spending on defense rose 9.2 percent in 2025. The underlying driver of the US’s own spending priorities remained intact: $9.9 billion was allocated to the nuclear-armed Columbia-class submarine programme and $13.9 billion to the conventionally armed Virginia-class programme, reflecting a strategic posture centred on nuclear modernisation and Indo-Pacific deterrence of China. SIPRI’s Nan Tian noted: “The decline in US military expenditure in 2025 is likely to be short-lived.” The Congressional Budget Office projects US defence outlays will cross $1.1 trillion by 2033.
China: $336 billion and a two-decade upward trajectory. China remained the world’s second-largest military spender at approximately $336 billion. While still far below US levels, China’s defence budget has grown steadily over the past two decades as the country expands its military capabilities and regional influence. As a proportion of global spending, China accounts for approximately 12%; a share that has been rising consistently since the early 2000s.
China’s military modernisation is structured around three objectives: blue-water naval capability to project power beyond its near seas, advanced missile systems capable of denying US carrier operations in the Western Pacific, and a nuclear modernisation programme expanding both warhead numbers and delivery platforms. None of these programmes is scaling back.
Russia: $190 billion and the highest share of government spending ever recorded. In 2025, military expenditure as a share of government spending reached the highest level ever recorded in both Russia and Ukraine. Russia’s $190 billion figure which SIPRI acknowledges is a significant underestimate due to the opacity of Russian defence classification; represents approximately 6.6% of global military spending.
The Ukraine war has restructured Russian public finance: social spending has been compressed, industrial production has been redirected toward ordnance and equipment, and revenue from oil exports; partly maintained through the sanctions-porous Indian and Chinese markets, provides the fiscal oxygen for the military effort.
SIPRI noted: “Their spending is likely to keep growing in 2026 if the war continues, with revenues from Russia’s oil sales increasing and a major European Union loan expected by Ukraine.”
Germany’s historic ascent to fourth place. Germany’s emergence as the world’s fourth-largest military spender, ahead of the United Kingdom, France, and every other traditional European power except Russia. It is the single most structurally significant shift in the 2025 rankings.
Germany spent approximately $114 billion on defence in 2025, a level that would have been unthinkable in the pre-2022 political context. The Zeitenwende; the German term for the “turning point” in security policy declared by Chancellor Scholz after Russia’s 2022 invasion has produced a real and sustained increase in German defence spending, including a €100 billion special fund for military modernisation and a political commitment to sustaining NATO’s 2% GDP target that had been resisted for years. Europe more broadly spent 14% more on defence in 2025 than in 2024; the steepest regional increase among any geographic bloc measured by SIPRI.
India: $92 billion, driven by the May 2025 India-Pakistan conflict. India increased its military spending by 8.9 percent to $92.1 billion in 2025. India’s conflict with Pakistan in May 2025; which involved the use of combat aircraft, drones, and missiles pushed up military spending during the year.
Revised capital outlays for military aircraft systems were 50 percent higher than originally budgeted, while operations and personnel costs for the Indian Air Force were revised upwards by 18 percent from the original budget.
India now ranks fifth globally, ahead of the United Kingdom, Ukraine, Saudi Arabia, France, Japan, and Israel. The India-Pakistan conflict served as an accelerant for spending that was already increasing along a structural upward trend driven by the strategic competition with China along the Line of Actual Control.
Ukraine: $84 billion and the mathematics of existential war. Ukraine’s approximately $84 billion in military spending; placing it seventh globally, represents perhaps the most extraordinary number in the entire dataset when contextualised against the country’s economic size and population.
For a country with a GDP of approximately $200 billion, a military spend of $84 billion represents a share of national output that no major democracy has sustained in peacetime and that most cannot sustain even in active conflict.
Ukraine is only able to maintain this level because of the comprehensive financial support of European allies and the United States aid that has been restructured, in part, as loans rather than grants.
Poland, meanwhile, has emerged as one of Europe’s fastest-growing defence spenders as it accelerates military modernisation in recognition of its geographic position on NATO’s eastern flank.
The structural interpretation. The 2025 data does not describe a world preparing for war. It describes a world where every major security architecture; NATO in Europe, the US-led alliance system in the Pacific, India’s border posture, the Gulf states’ strategic hedging is being funded at levels not seen since the Cold War.
The causes are interconnected: the Ukraine war has demolished the assumption of a stable European security order; Chinese naval expansion has activated a Pacific arms competition; the India-Pakistan conflict has reminded South Asia that conventional war between nuclear-armed states remains possible; and the collapse of the Iran nuclear deal has pushed Middle Eastern states toward self-reliant deterrence.
The scale of US spending reflects its extensive global military presence, advanced weapons programmes, and network of alliances spanning Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. What is changing is that that presence is no longer unchallenged, and the nations that anchor the US alliance system are now investing at levels that reflect their own understanding of that fact.
The verdict. $2.88 trillion. $350 per person on earth. Eleven consecutive years of increases. A global military burden at its highest share of GDP since 2009. The top three military spenders; the USA, China, and Russia spent a combined total of $1,480 billion, or 51 percent of the global total.
The world is spending more on the capacity to destroy than it has at any point since the Cold War’s final decade. The institutions designed to prevent conflict; the United Nations, arms control treaties, multilateral diplomacy have not collapsed. But they have demonstrably failed to arrest the trend.
To check out our previous coverage on geopolitics, global security, and defence economics, read our articles here.
